Knowledge Base

In the series different types of plastic: PVC

In this series, we dive into the world of plastics. We analyse the capacities, applications, environmental impact, and recyclability of various synthetic materials. This time, we turn the spotlight on an extremely versatile construction and packaging material: Polyvinyl chloride, better known as PVC.

PVC is one of the most widely produced synthetic plastics in the world. The material is known for its long lifespan and broad versatility. You will find PVC on a large scale in the construction sector—think of sewage pipes, window frames, cables, and flooring—as well as in packaging such as blister packs for medicine and consumer goods.

Properties: pros and cons

The properties of PVC make it a popular material for long-term applications:

  • Advantages: PVC is exceptionally strong, durable in use, flame-retardant, and highly resistant to chemicals, moisture, and wear and tear.
  • Disadvantages: In its pure form, PVC is very hard and brittle. To make it flexible, additives and plasticisers are often required. Additionally, harmful substances such as hydrogen chloride can be released during incineration.

The environmental impact of PVC

To determine the precise environmental impact, we look at a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of 1 kg of PVC versus 1 kg of PET. This shows that the environmental performance varies significantly depending on the impact category.

In terms of climate change, PVC scores relatively favourably compared to PET: emissions amount to 2.55 kg CO₂-eq per kg, compared to 3.50 kg CO₂-eq for PET. PVC also has a lower impact in categories such as land use (1.97 Pt for PVC vs 2.52 Pt for PET). On the other hand, PVC scores considerably worse in impact categories such as water consumption (1.02 m³ vs 0.68 m³ for PET), freshwater ecotoxicity, and human toxicity. This demonstrates that looking at CO₂ emissions alone gives an incomplete picture of the overall environmental burden.

Recycling PVC

Although PVC has a long lifespan, processing it in the waste phase remains a major challenge.

  • Complex composition: Unlike a pure plastic such as PET, PVC often contains diverse additives (such as plasticisers and stabilisers). This makes sorting and mechanical recycling a complicated process.
  • Recycling rate: Approximately 24% of all PVC waste in Europe is actually recycled. This percentage is significantly lower than for PET (around 85%), mainly because PVC is widely used in long-lasting construction materials and due to its challenging chemical composition.

Conclusion

Due to its strength, chemical resistance, and long service life, PVC is a functional material, particularly for the construction and infrastructure sectors. LCA results show that CO₂ emissions during production are lower than those of PET, but that PVC scores higher on environmental impacts such as water consumption and toxicity. Owing to its complex composition with additives, PVC recycling continues to lag behind. Increasing collection and processing capacity is therefore essential to align PVC with the circular economy.

Frequently asked questions

Deciding if PET is better than PVC depends on which environmental impact you prioritize, as the 'better' choice varies by category. For example, while PET has a higher impact on climate change (3.50 kg CO2-eq vs. 2.55 kg CO2-eq for PVC), PVC has a greater impact on water use and ecotoxicity. A full assessment is needed to make a final choice.

A business can make plastic packaging easier to recycle by designing products using only one type of plastic, as mixed materials are very difficult to process. Additionally, a design that allows for easy removal of food residues and avoids shapes that might tilt and be missed by sorting machinery increases the chances of successful recycling. The fewer different materials used for components like sealants and fillers, the more recyclable the final product becomes.

Plastic is a key sustainability issue for businesses because of its large-scale use across many industries, its production from fossil fuels like oil, and the significant environmental damage caused by plastic waste. The article highlights that while plastic has useful properties like being lightweight and durable, its overall lifecycle impact makes it a complex and critical topic for a company's sustainability strategy.

No, recycling is not a complete solution for the plastic problem because of significant drawbacks. The article explains that the concentration of toxic substances can be higher in recycled plastic than in new plastic. Furthermore, the recycling process itself can release large amounts of microplastics into the environment, with one factory showing up to 13% of processed plastic ending up in its wastewater.

A business can take four key steps by signing the Dopper Wave declaration to reduce plastic waste. These actions include banning disposable water bottles from the organization, encouraging colleagues and visitors to drink tap water, reminding everyone to carry a reusable water bottle, and inspiring other organizations to join the movement.

Get your free LCA example

Get your free LCA example

Explore our free sample Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) report to gain practical insights into LCA methodologies and their real-world applications.

Start free version on Hedgehog Carbon Platform

Start your carbon footprint with a free trial on the Hedgehog Carbon Platform

This article is written by:
Max
Max
Communications
Send emailLinkedInBook a meeting

Get in touch

Whether you are a large or small business, a start-up or a company with a long history, offering a product, process, or service, we respond swiftly and support you in taking your next step.